general

‘Misunderstood the assignment’: Supreme Court justice slams colleagues in scathing dissent

U. S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a scathing dissent after the court issued a ruling on Thursday that she described as a “back-of-the-napkin” approach to solving the problem at hand. In a 6-3 ruling, the high court reversed a lower court order that blocked President Donald Trump’s executive order mandating transgender people only use their gender assigned at birth on their passports.”As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court misunderstands the assignment,” wrote Jackson in the dissent. “Our task in deciding stay applications is not simply to make a ‘back-of-the-napkin assessment of which party has the better legal argument.’Rather, the actual nub of the project (if we choose to involve ourselves in the matter at all) is to fairly determine whether the applicant’s showing justifies our extraordinary intervention. To do this, we consider not only the applicant’s likelihood of success on the merits, but also whether the applicant will suffer irreparable harm absent emergency intervention, as well as the relative harm to the parties and the public interest in the grant or denial of a stay,” she continued. “Here, the balance-of-the-equities factor requires weighing the harm to the Government from not being able to proceed immediately with its allegedly unlawful policy against the harm to the individuals who would be subjected to that policy,” Jackson explained, citing the court examples. “Balancing the equities is an important part of the analysis because it avoids unnecessary real-world injury to people with colorable legal claims.”She explained that for the past 33 years, transgender Americans have received passports with the sex markers that match their genders. It’s the Trump administration that changed the decades-long precedent of the option for citizens who could provide a doctor’s certification of gender reassignment. “The State Department’s sex-marker policies have thus long demonstrated that what is important for identification purposes is the bearer’s gender identity today,” Jackson emphasized. Now, trans people will be subject to additional questioning and probing if their sex on the passport doesn’t match their gender. All because of a decision by President Donald Trump, she said. “Why? Because two days earlier, on January 20, President Trump issued Executive Order No. 14168, characterizing transgender identity as ‘false’ and ‘corrosive’ to American society,” she wrote. “The order asserted that ‘the policy of the United States’ is ‘to recognize two sexes, male and female,’ which it defined based on the sex assigned ‘at conception.'”Read her full dissent here.

general

‘Awkward’: Conservative analyst reveals how Trump’s tariff case could blow up in his face

Conservative analyst Ben Shapiro argued on Wednesday night that the Supreme Court is putting President Donald Trump “in an awkward position” over his key economic policy. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in a case challenging Trump’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs under his emergency powers. Trump has argued that the tariffs are necessary to revive America’s manufacturing base. The Supreme Court seemed skeptical of those arguments on Wednesday, with Chief Justice John Roberts referring to them as a “tax” on the American people. Shapiro argued on CNN’s “NewsNight with Abby Phillip” that the Supreme Court could reject Trump’s tariff policy, which could have a ripple effect on his presidency. “One of the things that will be fascinating is if the court does strike it down, watch the stock market absolutely explode,” Shapiro said. “Seriously, you’ll watch the S&P 500 jump like nobody’s business, and the president is then going to be in the awkward position of having to explain why the markets are boosted by the rejection of his key policy.”.

general

Trump admits to Republicans the shutdown probably cost them in latest election

President Donald Trump privately told Senate Republicans at a White House gathering on Wednesday that the party’s stance on the federal government shutdown likely played a big role in the losses Republicans saw up and down the ballot in this week’s elections. Democrats saw massive overperformances across the country, winning or holding key races in Virginia, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, making gains in state legislatures, and generally turning back Trump-endorsed opponents at the local level in several states. Publicly, Trump has disavowed any blame for the issue, saying the main problem for Republicans was that he wasn’t on the ballot to boost their numbers. But according to CNN’s Alayna Treene, Trump had a more nuanced tone for key lawmakers in his party in the White House State Dining Room.”I thought we’d have a discussion after the press leaves about what last night represented, and what we should do about it. And also about the shutdown, how that relates to last night. I think if you read the pollsters, the shutdown was a big factor, negative for the Republicans,” said Trump. This could be a massive turning point in the standoff, noted Punchbowl News’ Jake Sherman on X, because congressional Republican leaders “have been big proponents of not negotiating with Democrats while the government is shut. After the romping last night, it sounds like Trump may want to change course.”The shutdown has dragged on for weeks, leaving millions of federal workers unpaid and causing key functions like air traffic control to start breaking down across the country. Democrats continue to demand Republicans negotiate on extending Affordable Care Act subsidies as a condition of providing votes to reopen the government. Republicans went into the standoff largely confident the public would blame Democrats for any ill effects of the shutdown, but in poll after poll, the opposite has happened, leaving the GOP frustrated and unsure of an exit strategy.

general

‘Turning the tables’: WSJ warns Trump Democrats defeated him on his own winning issue

President Donald Trump got a flashing warning sign in the GOP’s drubbing around the country last night, the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board wrote on Wednesday morning specifically, that Democrats have rallied around beating Trump on one of the main issues that won him the 2024 election in the first place.”Democrats are turning the tables on affordability, especially when they steer clear of leftist cultural snares,” wrote the board. All wings of the party, from the more center-left gubernatorial candidates Abigail Spanberger in Virginia and Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey, to progressive leftists like Zohran Mamdani in the New York City mayor race, ran on cost of living, inflation, and tackling housing expenses which throws a glaring spotlight on Trump, who ran on many of those issues last year and has seen many stagnate or get worse on his watch.”It’s telling that Ms. Sherrill tried to claim the mantle of affordability, promising to freeze utility rates, while attacking Mr. Ciattarelli as ‘High Tax Jack,’ based on a deceptive video clip,” wrote the board. “If Democrats can convince voters they’re a better bet for getting ahead economically, the GOP is in trouble in 2026. President Trump’s tariffs aren’t helping. Neither is the 3% inflation still eating away at the earnings and the raises of American workers.”The board, which has been sounding the alarm for months on Trump’s tariff plans, said things aren’t likely to get much better for the GOP as the 2026 midterm cycle ramps up.”This time Democrats had the advantage of rallying voters upset at President Trump. Exit polls showed Mr. Trump’s approval rating at 44% in New Jersey and 42% in Virginia. The era of MAGA triumphalism should be over,” wrote the board. The only possible comfort for traditional Republicans, they said, is that, Mamdani and his pledges of rent freezes and free bus service notwithstanding, “Democrats can see a model of electoral success that isn’t rooted in radicalism.”In short, they concluded, “The challenge for Republicans is that Democrats outside New York may be learning from their 2024 defeat.”.

general

‘Midterms will be brutal!’ Trump admits 2026 could be bloodbath as he barks demands at GOP

President Donald Trump issued a stern demand to Republican lawmakers Tuesday, one that if not met, could result in the GOP facing an electoral catastrophe in the upcoming midterm elections.“The Democrats are far more likely to win the Midterms, and the next Presidential Election, if we don’t do the Termination of the Filibuster (The Nuclear Option!), because it will be impossible for Republicans to get Common Sense Policies done with these Crazed Democrat Lunatics being able to block everything by withholding their votes,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.“FOR THREE YEARS, NOTHING WILL BE PASSED, AND REPUBLICANS WILL BE BLAMED. Elections, including the Midterms, will be rightfully brutal. If we do terminate the Filibuster, we will get EVERYTHING approved, like no Congress in History.”Trump has demanded recently that GOP lawmakers to eliminate the filibuster a procedural rule in the Senate that allows members to block a measure that receives less than 60 votes as a means to re-open the government, which as of Tuesday has been closed for 35 days, tying the record for the longest shutdown in U. S. history. Republicans, however, have remained hesitant to do so, including House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), who openly defied Trump’s request, though does not hold the authority to eliminate the Senate filibuster regardless.“TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER NOW, END THE RIDICULOUS SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATELY, AND THEN, MOST IMPORTANTLY, PASS EVERY WONDERFUL REPUBLICAN POLICY THAT WE HAVE DREAMT OF, FOR YEARS, BUT NEVER GOTTEN,” Trump wrote. “WE WILL BE THE PARTY THAT CANNOT BE BEATEN THE SMART PARTY!!!”.

Sitemap Index